(BGH = Federal Court of Justice – ‘Bundesgerichtshof’, the highest appellate court in Germany for civil and criminal cases).
on the decision of the Bundesgerichtshof of August 3, 2007,
in the case against Johannes W. F. Seiger,
Prime Minister of the Principality of Sealand.
The last couple of years were distinguished by existential turbulences that involuntarily restricted the activities of the Principality of Sealand to a few core fields and about which an in-depth commentary will be forthcoming shortly due to its public interest for Germany.
Nevertheless was the year 2007 rich in positive events in the technical field and above all state activities and developments. This culminated in the recognition of the Principality of Sealand and its representative by the Bundesgerichtshof, as witnessed in the following pages and is also reflected in the last missive from the District Court at Lippstadt (# 4.14 of the appendix).
This irritation lasting decades can be attributed in no small measure to the deliberate deception of the general public − including the judiciary − by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the FRG (# 4.2 of the appendix).
Thus all attempts by the Principality of Sealand to return the technical inheritance of the German Reich, among others the Vril technology, to its rightful owners have been thwarted. The rightful owner is a sovereign Germany without restrictions. This sovereignty however demands the lifting of all provisos of the Allies (# 3 of the appendix) that are still valid today. This may only be achieved in the context of a peace treaty between all parties of the Second World War.
This goal should be reachable within the next three years, as I also informed Federal Chancellor Merkel (# 4.10 of the appendix).
Johannes W. F. Seiger
Documentation in connection with the decision by the BGH of August 3, 2007
Concerning the Sovereignty of the Principality of Sealand as well as
the diplomatic immunity of its Prime Minister
Johannes W. F. Seiger
Whole Documentation - German (52,5 MB)
1. Comments by the Prime Minister in October 2007
2. to the BGH Decision of August 3, 2007 (whole subject 2 - German)
2.1. Conclusions concerning the BGH Decision
2.2. Original text of the BGH Decision
2.3. Comments by the Appellant 18.07.07
2.4. Inquiry by the BGH correspondent 04.07.07
2.5. Petition by the Attorney General 20.06.07
3. Concerning the Sovereignty of the FRG (whole subject 3)
3.1. Page 1: Transition Agreement 1990, Article 2 Paragraph 1
3.2. Page 2: Transition Agreement 1990, Article 7 Paragraph 1 and Conclusions:
Limited Sovereignty due to the provisos by the Allies
3.3. Letter by the Federal Ministry of Justice of 29.03.04:
Confirmation that both articles are in force
4. Documentation Concerning the Comments by the Appellant (summary)
4.1. Sheet 1–10: to the recovering of missing cultural goods (Amber Room) from the time of NS (30.08.98), Correspondence with G. Glogowski, Prime Minister of Lower Saxony
4.2. Sheet 11–36: Letter to Josef Fischer, Federal Minister of the Foreign office of March 15, 2005. Re: The views by yourself and your house concerning the State Quality of the Principality of Sealand
Answer: Ms Dr. S. Wasum-Rainer by proxy, letter of April 11, 2005: no diplomatic rights, no sanctity of the person
4.3. Sheet 37–109: Correspondence between the Chancellery of the FRG, the Foreign Office of the FRG, the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Russia and others
4.4. Sheet 110–140: M. Platzeck, Prime Minister of the State of Brandenburg, criminal complaint of May 10, 2007 concerning attempted murder as indirect delinquent. No answer.
4.5. Sheet 141–142: Register Court AG Potsdam: Insolvency proceedings on December 30 1999,
January 17, 2000: Deregistration of the company
4.6. Sheet 143–145: Finance court Münster, Decision of December 1, 1995 concerning the Sealand Trade Corporation: “This decision is incontestable.” – Thus the existence of the Sealand Trade Corporation is also incontestable.
4.7. Sheet 146–245: Dr. Schaubelt, Vice President of the District Court Potsdam, letter of November 27, 2005: Insolvency case of the Sealand Warenhandels- und Vertriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG
4.8. Sheet 246–249: Letter of July 5, 2007 by the tax authorities Luckenwalde: order of attachment and transfer of garnished clause for € 822.352,60.
4.9. Sheet 250–251: G. Schröder, Chancellor of the FRG, offer of April 26, 2005, personally to test a Sealand Generator (Vril Technology, cosmic or free energy). No answer.
4.10. Sheet 252–271: Dr. A. Merkel, Chancellor of the FRG, letter of September 20, 2006, demanding to engage visibly for a Peace Treaty – the formal ending of the Second World War. Testing offer for a Sealand Generator. No answer.
4.11. Sheet 272–281: Dr. G. Sabathil/Frau D. Jering (deputy), European Commission: Letter of January 17, 2007: Incarceration despite diplomatic immunity.
H. van Steen, European Commission, new and renewable energy sources, letter of April 24, 2007: Presentation of the Vril Technology and testing offer. No answer.
4.12. Sheet 282–285: Letter of June 1, 2007, to the Ambassadors of the four Allies: Information about the letter to Dr. A. Merkel, Chancellor of the FRG
4.13. Sheet 286: W. Rissmann, Director of the District Court Luckenwalde, letter of May 12, 1999: Revocation of the acknowledgement of the diplomatic immunity “As directed by the President of the Higher Regional Court Brandenburg …”
Not in the BGH File:
4.14. Letter by the District Court Lippstadt of October 16, 2007, for the first time with the correct legal address following the decision by the BGH as well as the preceding letter by the Prime Minister J. W. F. Seiger of October 10, 2007 to the District Court Lippstadt
The Criminal Acts
by the Brandenburg Judiciary
Bound by Directives
«V. To the acting person J. W. F. Seiger we will point out the following for the present and future proceedings:
The Court is cognisant of the legal conception there concerning the situation in Germany. Especially is known the participation in the on-going negation of the existence and legality of the constituted state and legal order in the joining area and in the existent federal area including the intimidation attempts resulting therefrom. This happens under continuing use of the term “Principality of Sealand” including all resulting modifications, deductions etc.
Any remittance of documents to this Court by using the term “Principality of Sealand” including all deductions, modifications, references etc. will in future be regarded as disrespect and insult of the Court; these documents will be treated accordingly, if applicable be handed back to you for rescission of the disrespect/insult.»
Sealand Trade Corporation –
State-owned company of the Principality of Sealand
The Sealand Trade Corporation is recognised by the attribution of the following BRD registration numbers:
USt-Id.: DE 164906133 by the Bundesamt für Finanzen,
then the Turnover Tax Number Nr. 347/5894/0229 by the Finanzamt Rheda/Wiedenbrück
and the Customs Number [ZNR]: 3723143 by the Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.
Brandenburg Judiciary  [December 12, 2003 - parts in English]
Brandenburg Judiciary  [November 11, 2003 - in German only]
Brandenburg Judiciary  [August 28, 2003]
Brandenburg Judiciary  [July 21, 2003]
Brandenburg Judiciary  [June 26, 2003]
Brandenburg Judiciary  [June 8, 2003]
Brandenburg Judiciary (1)
In a letter of January 27, 2003, to the Prime Minister of the State Brandenburg, Mr Matthias Platzeck, the Prime Minister of the Principality of Sealand, Johannes W. F. Seiger, in unusually sharp manner and ulimately pointed to the obviously serious grievances within the Brandenburg Judiciary. Also letter of May 2, 2003 to the Minister of Justice in Brandenburg, Ms Barbara Richstein.
At present in German only!
Press Release [PDF]
Download Press Release as Word file
Brandenburg Judiciary (2)
Permanent Breaches of Law by the Brandenburg Judicary – obviously done in a systematic way
In December 1999 the Government of the Principality of Sealand announced in its German and English websites: Extensive documents about the cooperation of the Brandenburg judiciary and the insolvency administrator will soon be published here.
Secondly! Subject: Sealand Trade Corporation – state-owned company of the Principality of Sealand, represented by J. W. F. Seiger.
In December 1999 the Government of the Principality of Sealand announced in its German and English websites: «Extensive documents about the cooperation of the Brandenburg judiciary and the insolvency administrator will soon be published here.»
Subject: Sealand Trade Corporation – state-owned company of the Principality of Sealand, represented by J. W. F. Seiger.
In decision 12 C 71/02 by the district court Luckenwalde of January 22, 2002 – Applicant: Sealand Trade Corporation as state-owned Company of the Principality of Sealand, represented by Johannes W. F. Seiger, Ahrensdorfer Strasse 7, Löwendorf/Trebbin – RiAG (Judge) Mr Vahldiek drew the following conclusions: «Sending any documents to the court using the term “Principality of Sealand” inclusive of all corollaries, variations, references etc. will henceforth by classed as contempt and defamation of the court: they will be handeled accordingly; where appropriate sent back to you to enable you to rescind the contempt/defamation.» Original as pdf including letter by the district court Luckenwalde to the Plenipotentiary for the German Reich
Text of the Press Release including documents [html]
Word file [without documents]
Word File | Pdf File
Pdf file all cocuments included [9MB] Brandenburg Justiciary  [9 MB] | This one compressed: zip file
[at present in german only]
Brandenburg Judiciary (3)
Memorandum concerning case record 27 Js 1095/98 at the Public Prosecutor’s Office Potsdam about an alleged violation of the Kriegswaffenkontrollgesetz (law controlling weapons of war) (atomic weapons, chemical weapons and actual exercise of force)*
*see also Chancellor letter of January 14, 2000 (here as PDF file)
Sealand, July 21, 2003:
Due to actual international events we publish here four letters by the Government of the Principality of Sealand to the Ambassadors of the four Allied “Victorious Forces” in Germany – including as attachment the Sealand Government Resolution 11/98
All related documents in one pdf file German & English
or as zip-Datei
Brandenburg Judiciary (4)
The following documentation will prove that since 1992 the destruction of the Sealand GmbH und Co. KG has been knowingly and wilfully attempted in collusion with heads of LPG’s (Landesprojektgruppen, country project groups), notaries public, liquidators, one mayor, lawyers and the Brandenburg judiciary and that insolvency proceedings were set in motion by the responsible politicians of the State of Brandenburg.
Read more ...
Brandenburg Judiciary (5)
To the Press Release [In German only]
Blatant legal infringements in the ‹Insolvency Proceedings› against the Sealand Handelsgesellschaft mbH
In order to destroy the representatives of the Principality of Sealand in Germany economically, criminal methods have been staged in so-called “insolvency proceedings” against the Sealand Handelsgesellschaft mbH and are implemented by insider arrangements. In connection with this our legal department has found 98 (ninety-eight!) procedural errors and legal infringements by the public offices and the insolvency administrator officially appointed by them.
This Press Release as:
Word File (Text only - German)
Pdf File with pictures included
Brandenburg Judiciary (6)
The Minister of Justice of Brandenburg incapable of taking action
Breaches of law continue to be perpetrated
How the so-called ‹Protocols of the Elders of Zion› evolve from crude forgery to historical truth…
Here we document the actual state of the correspondence regarding ‘Brandenburg Judiciary vs. the Representatives of the Principality of Sealand’.
To the Press Release
Johannes W. F. Seiger / Sealand Trade Corporation vs. Kreissparkasse (regional savings bank) Teltow-Fläming
In res Johannes W. F. Seiger / Sealand Trade Corporation vs. Kreissparkasse (regional savings bank) Teltow-Fläming
In a letter by the Kreissparkasse Teltow-Fläming of February 7, 2000, to Mr. Johannes W. F. Seiger / Sealand Trade Corporation, they announce that their business relationship is cancelled with immediate effect. When Mr. Seiger tried to clear the account and empty the safe-deposit box, he was not admitted. Then, two days later, he was barred from entering the bank at all. In a further letter of May 2, 2000, the lawyers Sobczak & Kollegen as legal representatives of the Kreissparkasse Teltow-Fläming told Mr. Seiger, that, if he would not hand over the key (how, being barred?) the safe-deposit box No. 63/R would be forced open.
Letters to the Board of directors of the Kreissparkasse Teltow-Fläming (from the Imperial Ministry of Finance)
Letter from Sobczak & Partners, Lawyers (safe-deposit box was forced open)
In that safe-deposit box were secret documents which according to the notarised protocol of March14, 2001, (see also German original) about the breaking open of the safe deposit box 63/r /righthand cupboard), UR No. 326/2001 by the notary public Gattner at Luckenwalde became accesible to the persons named in the said protocol because no sealing had taken place. Among other things there were plans indicating where German flying discs and their construction plans are stored, documents proving that Hans-Dietrich Genscher had co-operated for over thirty years with the Stasi (state security service) of the former GDR as Kundschafter (effectively a spy), and about kickbacks being paid to prominent politicians of the FRG amounting to millions in connection with the arrangement of the billion-Mark credits to the former GDR (see also Press Release of August 1, 2001).
See also: Press Release of June and July 2003
Stand: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003